As you can see, my candidacy [which I did not know was even a remote possibility] was approved on June 11.
The letter goes on to state that the IAHCP highlights and profiles the world’s Top Surgeons. The association features physicians who have demonstrated success and leadership in their profession. It even provides an opportunity to network, collaborate, and share information with other medical professionals from around the globe. [Just what I need—another social network of physicians.]
Inclusion in the book “The Leading Physicians of the World” is not only a tribute to my success, but is also a valuable resource for potential patients who are looking for a Top Surgeon in their area.
There is no charge for this honor.
I’m sure the organization did a lot of research before it approved my candidacy. I wonder how they missed that I’ve been retired from the practice of surgery for more than two years?
I thought this was remarkable, but last year New York Times writer Dr. Abigail Zuger easily topped me.
Last year, she wrote that a relative of hers had been named one of the world’s top physicians. All he had to do was to verify his biographical information, and he would be included in the same book and online reference mentioned above.
The good doctor wasn’t able to do so because unfortunately, he died 16 years ago.
What have we learned here?
As I have said on many occasions [e.g., here and here], one must take all ratings with a pinch of salt.