A Single-Cell Breakthrough: newly developed technology dissects properties of single stem cells

0
112

Single stem cells (green) and Paneth cells (red) which function as a ‘niche’ cells to support stem cell survival and growth.
Credit: Magness Lab (UNC School of Medicine)

The human gut is a remarkable thing. Every week the intestines regenerate a new lining, sloughing off the equivalent surface area of a studio apartment and refurbishing it with new cells. For decades, researchers have known that the party responsible for this extreme makeover were intestinal stem cells, but it wasn’t until this year that Scott Magness, PhD, associate professor of medicine, cell biology and physiology, and biomedical engineering, figured out a way to isolate and grow thousands of these elusive cells in the laboratory at one time. This high throughput technological advance now promises to give scientists the ability to study stem cell biology and explore the origins of inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal cancers, and other gastrointestinal disorders.

But it didn’t come easy.

One Step Forward . . .

When Magness and his team first began working with intestinal stem cells some years ago, they quickly found themselves behind the eight ball. Their first technique involved using a specific molecule or marker on the surface of stem cells to make sure they could distinguish stem cells from other intestinal cells. Then Magness’s team would fish out only the stem cells from intestinal tissues and grow the cells in Petri dishes. But there was a problem. Even though all of the isolated cells had the same stem cell marker, only one out of every 100 could “self-renew” and differentiate into specialized cells like a typical stem cell should. (Stem cells spawn cells that have specialized functions necessary for any organ to work properly.)

“The question was: why didn’t the 99 others behave like stem cells?” Magness said. “We thought it was probably because they’re not all the same, just like everybody named Judy doesn’t look the same. There are all kinds of differences, and we’ve been presuming that these cells are all the same based on this one name, this one molecular marker. That’s been a problem. But the only way to solve it so we could study these cells was to look at intestinal stem cells at the single cell level, which had never been done before.”

Magness is among a growing contingent of researchers who recognize that many of the biological processes underlying health and disease are driven by a tiny fraction of the 37 trillion cells that make up the human body. Individual cells can replenish aging tissues, develop drug resistance, and become vehicles for viral infections. And yet the effects of these singular actors are often missed in biological studies that focus on pooled populations of thousands of seemingly “identical” cells.

Distinguishing between the true intestinal stem cells and their cellular look-a-likes would require isolating tens of thousands of stem cells and tracking the behavior of each individual cell over time. But Magness had no idea how to accomplish that feat. Enter Nancy Allbritton, PhD, chair of the UNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering. The two professors met one day to discuss Magness joining the biomedical engineering department as an adjunct faculty member. And they did discuss it. And Magness did join. But the meeting quickly turned into collaboration. One of Allbritton’s areas of expertise is microfabrication — the ability to squeeze large devices into very small footprints. During their meeting, Allbritton showed Magness her latest creation, a device smaller than a credit card dotted with 15,000 tiny wells for culturing cells.

“It was like a light bulb went off, and I realized I was looking at the answer to a billion of our problems,” Magness said.

Micro Magic

Each microwell is as thick as a strand of hair. By placing individual stem cells into the microwells, Magness and postdoctoral fellow Adam Gracz, PhD, could watch the cells grow into fully developed tissue structures known as mini-guts. Each microwell could be stamped with a specific address, which would allow researchers to track stem cells that were behaving as expected and those that weren’t.

Allbritton’s lab came up with another feature during collaboration with Magness’s team. If the researchers decided they wanted to study a specific mini-gut further, they could use a special tool known as a microwand to pop out the magnetized well and either grow the tissue separately or extract DNA for genetic analyses.

The new technology is designed to help researchers dissect the mechanisms of intestinal stem cell biology and investigate why some cells behave differently than others. It can also help scientists explore how a cell’s neighborhood or “niche” might impact the cell’s behavior. This is important because, in an actual gut, stem cells don’t exist in a vacuum; they’re surrounded by almost a dozen other cell types, including other epithelial cells, immune cells, muscle cells, and nerve cells. The new technology allowed Magness’s lab to mix different cell types and culture them together to see what would happen when those cells lived within close proximity of each other.

Cellular Precision Medicine

For example, epithelial cells called Paneth cells had already been shown to support the growth of intestinal stem cells. Gracz decided to use the new technology to test the hypothesis that the more Paneth cells in the neighborhood, the better the stem cells would grow. He examined thousands of wells where Paneth and stem cells had been cultured together, and he was surprised to find that the number of Paneth cells did not seem to affect stem cell growth. However, when Gracz looked closer, he discovered that intestinal stem cells that were touching Paneth cells did have a survival advantage over those that were not touching the Paneth cells, indicating that direct cell-to-cell contact was required to provide support.

These results were published in the journal Nature Cell Biology.

“With this platform we could go back and test experimentally some hypotheses that have been proposed in the literature,” Gracz said. “We’ve been able to do that in a way that wasn’t possible before. The most powerful part of this approach is that it allows us to get deeper and deeper into the science of the gut with more and more resolution. We’ll be able to see things and study them, especially as they relate to human health and disease, to a greater degree than before.”

The researchers say that the new technology could also be applicable to cells derived from other tissue, such as breast, pancreas, or practically any other part of the body. One day, the technology could become part of a precision medicine approach to home in on the behavior of single stem cells as indicators of an individual’s response to specific drugs.

“The big idea emerging in biology that’s cool but confounding is something called stochasticity — the notion that different behaviors of an organ’s constituent parts drive one collective behavior of the organ as a whole,” Gracz said. “So all the stem cells might be doing different things, but then the outcome that keeps your body running is hopefully always the same.”

Magness added, “Single cell technology like this allows us to dissect this stochasticity and pull it apart, and then later we can put it all back together again to understand a disease much better than we do right now. And understanding a disease better allows us to come up with better treatments for patients.”


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of North Carolina School of Medicine. The original article was written by Marla Vacek Broadfoot, PhD. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Adam D. Gracz, Ian A. Williamson, Kyle C. Roche, Michael J. Johnston, Fengchao Wang, Yuli Wang, Peter J. Attayek, Joseph Balowski, Xiao Fu Liu, Ryan J. Laurenza, Liam T. Gaynor, Christopher E. Sims, Joseph A. Galanko, Linheng Li, Nancy L. Allbritton, Scott T. Magness. A high-throughput platform for stem cell niche co-cultures and downstream gene expression analysis. Nature Cell Biology, 2015; 17 (3): 340 DOI: 10.1038/ncb3104